View Single Post
      08-30-2010, 07:28 PM   #26
bm323
Captain
194
Rep
850
Posts

Drives: 12.2 E92 M3 ZCP; 12.7 C63
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sg

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sois View Post
Hmmm, I have driven both as well and is quite clear to me that the N54 is a lot more responsive (less lag) and is generally quicker. I was able to modulate a 6sp N55 a bit better than an automatic N55 (dreadful compared to an N54 automatic). However, the 6spd N54 walked on the 6spd N55. This discrepancy is made quite clear by BMW with the new 335is coupe and cab (fitted with the N54 engine and listed with 320hp and 332tq). These are the values N54 engine owners suspected were more realistic all along. The N55 stock does not possess the output that the stock N54 engine possesses and this has been confirmed with more realistic dyno tests.

From what I have read and having driven cars with both engines and auto/6spd combos this is as clear as day to me (the superior quickness/responsiveness of the N54). However, they are both fantastic engines and the N55 I suspect is much more economical and easy for BMW to handle (I believe the N55 runs cooler as well). I can only imagine how many buyers think they are getting the same engine though (twin turbo versus twin scroll terminology...). Clever marketing.

Anyway, Cheers!
If so, why does the heavier f10 have a faster acceleration at higher speeds?

Left column 2010 535i and right column F10 535i


TEST DATA
Acceleration to mph
0-30 2.0 sec 2.1 sec
0-40 2.8 3.1
0-50 4.2 4.2
0-60 5.5 5.6
0-70 7.1 7.2
0-80 9.3 9
0-90 11.4 11.2
0-100 13.9 13.8
0-110 18.4 17.6
0-120 22.2 21.6
Passing, 45-65 mph 2.6 2.7
Quarter mile 14.1 sec @ 100.6 mph 14.1 sec @ 101.0 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph 112 ft 109 ft
Top-gear revs @ 60 mph 2150 rpm 1900 rpm

Quote "Our quarter-mile time of 14.1 seconds was identical, and in fact the trap speed was up from 100.6 mph to 101.0. The 60-mph-dash was a tenth slower at 5.6 seconds, while times to the higher speeds were improved (21.6 seconds to 120 mph beats the twin-turbo featherweight by six-tenths). That's impressive, especially if the fuel economy ends up equal or better."

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz0xdbhkfkE

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinSF View Post
your link has posts with differing views

Last edited by bm323; 08-30-2010 at 07:35 PM..
Appreciate 0