|
Inherent balance in the 6cyl vs the 4cyl is not prejudice, its an observable fact. By "I'm just going by what others say", i'm saying I do not completely understand technically how it works, but that is not 'prejudice'. Prejudice would be saying 6cyl>4cyl because it is 'more' or a similar superficial reason, which contains no merit at its core. Inherent balance does not fit this, unless you can explain to me how there is no such thing in the 6cyl. I'm all ears.
A 4 cyl. is not 'bad' inherently, it's just inferior to the 6cyl for the above mentioned reason. You're getting less /or worse for the same price, the replacement of displacement/cyl. with turbos, that's the complaint basically. We're not out to deny all 4 cyl. the right to exist, we're just resistant to taking away our NA I6 and giving us a I4-T.
|