2010 2011 BMW 5 Series Forum F10
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
 

2010 2011 BMW 5 Series Forum F10 BMW 5-Series (F10) Forums General 5-Series Sedan and Wagon (F10 / F11) Forum 32hp & 60 ft/lb torque on intake alone?
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-20-2016, 09:57 PM   #1
dolmaxdog
New Member
7
Rep
9
Posts

Drives: 11 535xi
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: nyc

iTrader: (0)

32hp & 60 ft/lb torque on intake alone?

Hi All,

Saw this on Turner Motorsport Website,

https://www.turnermotorsport.com/p-3...intake/?pdk=Ag

This sounds too good to be true even for a sealed unit...Any thoughts?
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2016, 12:10 AM   #2
PJinCA
USAF Pararescue Veteran
United_States
332
Rep
770
Posts

Drives: F10 535
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Anyone who claims 32 HP from an intake is a BS artist, period. Any intake is good for maybe 5 HP realistically. That particular company aFe has a history of BS claims. Back when I got my first E60 they were claiming big gains from those intakes, and several dyno runs proved their intakes actually suffered from horrendous heat soak and actually LOST 10 HP in the E60. Seriously, hundreds of people returned their intakes to shops I knew for refunds.
Appreciate 6
      03-21-2016, 06:03 PM   #3
Sedoy
Captain
680
Rep
997
Posts

Drives: F10
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (0)



hahaha...

Last edited by Sedoy; 03-21-2016 at 09:07 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2016, 08:00 PM   #4
mko9
Second Lieutenant
mko9's Avatar
United_States
56
Rep
244
Posts

Drives: '11 535i
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Yorktown, VA

iTrader: (1)

Perhaps looking in the right forum and using the search function might turn something up.

http://f10.5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=987089

http://f10.5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1201626
__________________
Mike

'04 330i ZHP
'11 535i
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2016, 10:10 PM   #5
Bmw doubles
Dream crusher
Bmw doubles's Avatar
United_States
984
Rep
2,421
Posts

Drives: Fast
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: westside

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2011 535  [0.00]
The gains could actually be there if you specially tuned for that setup. Even if it was tuned to that hardware I think you're talking about top end when CFM would be at its highest. Even in that scenario you still need to scoop the air in for maximum pressure.
__________________
535i MIssion Performance, PS2, Helix HPFP Kit, Wagner FMIC, Spec 3 clutch, Steel SMF, Wolf Racing CP, UUC SSK, GFB dv, SprintBooster, Custom Dynomax Exhaust, M5 Sways, Eibach OE Springs, Koni Sports Adjustable, Custom Short Ram CAI

IG: @bmwdoubles
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2016, 10:46 PM   #6
EL Jeffe 5
Major
EL Jeffe 5's Avatar
United_States
613
Rep
1,254
Posts

Drives: CBR1000RR
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Iowa

iTrader: (0)

Intake is just BS
I never spend my money on junk like that
its been proven intake doesn't give more hp
Appreciate 1
      03-22-2016, 08:34 AM   #7
Hasser
Major
Hasser's Avatar
Isle of Man
447
Rep
1,161
Posts

Drives: 2014 F10 M5
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Isle of Man

iTrader: (0)

i commented on another post about this afe intake.

they are not claiming a gain of 32 hp on the peak power output, but if you look at the dyno graphs it shows an increase of 32 hp over stock lower down the range / band.

so where say the stock intake will be giving 200 hp and 4,000 rpm - the afe will give you 232 hp at 4,000 rpm (i just made the figures up but you know what i mean?) so not a peak output increase of 32 hp over stock, but an increase over stock in comparison.
__________________
2014 M5
1990 E30 318i Touring
1999 E38 728i -sold
M235i - sold
Activehybrid 5 - sold
Appreciate 1
      03-22-2016, 09:35 AM   #8
lsturbointeg
Lieutenant General
lsturbointeg's Avatar
United_States
9161
Rep
14,521
Posts

Drives: 2011 535i Jet Black
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Asian lost in OH

iTrader: (0)

are people just better off getting a K&N drop in filter instead with somewhat gains or does this fall into hype?
__________________
~F90Conversion~21"3Piece Forged AvantGardeWheels~KWV1Coilovers~CQUENCE slotted/drilled rotors~GoodridgeStainlesslines~MeisterschaftQuadEx haust~Akrapovic 4"tips~VRSF DP~VRSF CP~TurboSmart BOV~K&N filter~CarbonFiberExteriorComponents~GladenAlphaCo mponents~MatchUp7BMW~Punch P300-12T~
Follow me on Instagram: lsturbointeg
Appreciate 0
      03-22-2016, 11:15 AM   #9
jabbarjd
Private
jabbarjd's Avatar
United_States
55
Rep
80
Posts

Drives: 2019 BMW X7 xDrive50i
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: ATX

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I went with the Burger intake because it looks better (IMO) and cost less, and I knew I wouldn't get any significant power gains. All I wanted was for my F10 to breathe and sound a little better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasser View Post
i commented on another post about this afe intake.

they are not claiming a gain of 32 hp on the peak power output, but if you look at the dyno graphs it shows an increase of 32 hp over stock lower down the range / band.

so where say the stock intake will be giving 200 hp and 4,000 rpm - the afe will give you 232 hp at 4,000 rpm (i just made the figures up but you know what i mean?) so not a peak output increase of 32 hp over stock, but an increase over stock in comparison.
Hasser is absolutely right. aFe does disclose a dyno run, but there is a two month gap between runs and their claim is essentially a max delta between the two setups, not a delta between the peak power/torque readings.
http://afepower.com/catalog/54-82082...082-1H1600.jpg
__________________

2019 BMW x7 xDrive50i in Phytonic Blue on Black -- 22" 756 Wheels
2015 BMW x5 xDrive35i in Mineral White on Canberra Beige - (sold)
2013 BMW 535i M Sport in Titanium Silver on Black - (sold)
1999 BMW z3 2.3 in Space Gray on Black - (sold)
Appreciate 2
      03-22-2016, 11:45 AM   #10
Hasser
Major
Hasser's Avatar
Isle of Man
447
Rep
1,161
Posts

Drives: 2014 F10 M5
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Isle of Man

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jabbarjd View Post
I went with the Burger intake because it looks better (IMO) and cost less, and I knew I wouldn't get any significant power gains. All I wanted was for my F10 to breathe and sound a little better.



Hasser is absolutely right. aFe does disclose a dyno run, but there is a two month gap between runs and their claim is essentially a max delta between the two setups, not a delta between the peak power/torque readings.
http://afepower.com/catalog/54-82082...082-1H1600.jpg
i went with the BMS also.

purely on lower price point and it does look good in the engine bay with it being open.

plus in the UK it never really gets above 20 degrees C if you're lucky so heat soak etc, shouldnt be an issue compared to say running it in hotter ambient temps of other parts of the world.
__________________
2014 M5
1990 E30 318i Touring
1999 E38 728i -sold
M235i - sold
Activehybrid 5 - sold
Appreciate 0
      03-22-2016, 12:34 PM   #11
EL Jeffe 5
Major
EL Jeffe 5's Avatar
United_States
613
Rep
1,254
Posts

Drives: CBR1000RR
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Iowa

iTrader: (0)

watch this please
Appreciate 2
      03-23-2016, 02:44 PM   #12
mko9
Second Lieutenant
mko9's Avatar
United_States
56
Rep
244
Posts

Drives: '11 535i
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Yorktown, VA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lsturbointeg View Post
are people just better off getting a K&N drop in filter instead with somewhat gains or does this fall into hype?
Reference the first thread I linked, above. I did before and after dynos going from a K&N drop in filter to the AFE intake. Contrary to El Jeffe's assertions, there is an improvement. Just not 32hp or 60ftlbs anywhere in my dyno curve.
__________________
Mike

'04 330i ZHP
'11 535i
Appreciate 1
      03-23-2016, 04:54 PM   #13
PJinCA
USAF Pararescue Veteran
United_States
332
Rep
770
Posts

Drives: F10 535
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

One trick aFe has used in the past is running the stock setup on the dyno with no fan in front of the car, then rerunning the dyno run with the aFe intake and a fan blowing DIRECTLY on the intake. Hmm, wonder why it made power?
Also, posting a dyno "showing" gains of 32 hp on your website is effectively claiming your intake provides 32 hp gains. Which is disingenuous at the least.
If they reach the claimed numbers via a tune, then that must be stated with the dyno graph, as any legitimate company would.

I would get the BMS intake as well, not so much because of expected power gains, but the sound of the engine breathing would be nice. As with all tuning parts, it will not be one part that gets big gains - rather it would be the sum of the parts (intake, exhaust, turbo, fuel, down pipe, charge pipe) + a tune designed to optimize the performance of the upgrades that will make the best power.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST