2010 2011 BMW 5 Series Forum F10
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 

2010 2011 BMW 5 Series Forum F10 BMW 5-Series (F10) Forums General 5-Series Sedan and Wagon (F10 / F11) Forum F10 Earns "2010 TOP SAFETY PICK" From IIHS
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-28-2010, 08:59 PM   #1
Jason
Administrator
Jason's Avatar
United_States
6689
Rep
16,676
Posts

 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Arrow F10 Earns "2010 TOP SAFETY PICK" From IIHS

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has announced the 2011 BMW 5 Series as a Top Safety Pick. The F10 earned the top rating of “Good” based on its performance in each crash test.

The F10 previously received a full five stars in EURO NCAP's tests - http://f10.5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=395607

Quote:
“2010 TOP SAFETY PICK” Award for 5 Series Sedan

* 29.07.2010
* Press Release

Woodcliff Lake, NJ – July 29, 2010 10:00am EDT… BMW of North America today announced that the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) declared the 2011 BMW 5 Series Sedan a 2010 Top Safety Pick. The new 5 Series earned the top rating of “Good” based on its performance in each of the Institute’s crash tests.

Receiving the 2010 Top Safety Pickfor the 2011 BMW 5 Series Sedan is one of numerous awards BMW has earned from the IIHS over the years. In fact, as a result of tests conducted in 2008, the 2009 BMW 3 Series Sedan as well as the X3 and X5 Sports Activity Vehicles® earned the IIHS Top Safety Pick.

“Safety has long been a priority for BMW, so earning a Top Safety Pick from IIHS means a great deal,” said Jim O’Donnell, President of BMW of North America, LLC. “The press has praised the car and our consumers have eagerly awaited its arrival in showrooms. This award demonstrates that we left no stone unturned in the development of the all-new 2011 5 Series Sedan.”

“The new 5 Series integrates the latest crash avoidance technology with outstanding crashworthiness in a beautiful package that inspires confidence and peace of mind,” added Tom Baloga, Vice-President of Engineer US for BMW. “Advanced materials, sophisticated design techniques, and state-of-the-art testing succeeded in delivering a fantastic new 5 Series that will become the benchmark for every premium model in this segment.”

The Institute rates vehicles “Good,” “Acceptable,” “Marginal” or “Poor” based on performance in high-speed Frontal Offset and Side Impact crash tests as well as an evaluation of the vehicle’s Rear Crash Protection/Head Restraints, which protect against neck injuries in rear impact crashes. A stringent new Roof Strength test was added in 2009. In order for a vehicle to become a Top Safety Pick, it must earn “Good” ratings in all four Institute tests. Additionally, as of 2007, winning vehicles must also offer electronic stability control – a standard feature on all BMW vehicles since model year 2000, known as Dynamic Stability Control. The IIHS requires this feature based on Institute research indicating that stability control significantly reduces crash risk, especially the risk of fatal single vehicle crashes, by helping drivers maintain control of their vehicles during emergency maneuvers.


Name:  f10crash.jpg
Views: 2481
Size:  128.9 KB

Name:  f10crash1.jpg
Views: 2405
Size:  115.2 KB

Name:  f10crash2.jpg
Views: 3096
Size:  171.0 KB

Name:  f10crash3.jpg
Views: 2408
Size:  223.5 KB

Name:  f10crash4.jpg
Views: 2424
Size:  160.6 KB
__________________
Check on the Latest BMW News
Become a fan of Bimmerpost Facebook
Follow us on Bimmerpost Twitter
Subscribe to Bimmerpost Youtube Channel

Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 10:27 AM   #2
E39hijinks
EUROFTW
2
Rep
193
Posts

 
Drives: E30 E36 E46
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

F10 Earns "2010 TOP SAFETY PICK" From IIHS

The results: Excellent in every category. Roof, front, and side.

However, I am dissapointed that the although still rated "excellent," the F10's roof can only take 15,000 lbs before crushing a certain amount where the Hyundai Genesis can take 19,000 lbs and the Mercedes E-Class 20,000 lbs.

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/roof/detailsbyclass.aspx?10

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1374


Also in the side-test, the E-Class roof structure didn't bend at all. (Same with the C-Class)-- a result which I've never seen any other car tested by the IIHS do-- I've yet to take a look at the technical measurements, will do so soon.

I'm not complaining, the new F10 is obviously an exceptionally safe car (the ratings prove it) but it seems Mercedes has edged BMW out in terms of body strength.

edit:

I took a look at the tech info. The F10 seems to have a slightly more stable passenger compartment in a frontal collision -- just barely and a somewhat stronger footwell. The dash and A-pillar both see ZERO movement after the crash. The mercedes saw some negative movement -- about 1 cm or so.

The E-Class's side structure, however, moved 5cm less towards the centerline of the steering wheel. This means you have 5 more CM of protection in the E-Class in a side collision!

Last edited by E39hijinks; 07-29-2010 at 10:35 AM.
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 01:54 PM   #3
Levi
Brigadier General
Levi's Avatar
Czech_Republic
124
Rep
3,443
Posts

 
Drives: Alfa Romeo
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Prague

iTrader: (0)

Best thing is not to crash. But still nice to feel in a safe car.
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 02:19 PM   #4
BMWI6
Major
BMWI6's Avatar
Colombia
32
Rep
1,322
Posts

 
Drives: 335is
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Miami, Fl

iTrader: (2)

The roof structure seems to be the weak point in this car as proven in the several crash pictures I have seen. I'm sure it's a safe car, but as another user said, Mercedes is definitively making a safer products with more rigid pillars.
__________________
If everything seems under control, then you aren't going fast enough"
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 02:30 PM   #5
E60orBust
Captain
United_States
15
Rep
670
Posts

 
Drives: "The Brothers //M-Sport" E90/2
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MD

iTrader: (0)

"Oh S***, I can't watch this, hey everybody i can't watch this!" - Abe (NWS!)

__________________
Down for Maintenance
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 02:36 PM   #6
bavarian19
General
bavarian19's Avatar
United_States
233
Rep
18,815
Posts

 
Drives: Car
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VA

iTrader: (23)

Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 02:55 PM   #7
stickypaws
Dictator
stickypaws's Avatar
21
Rep
1,817
Posts

 
Drives: people crazy
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: where you want to be

iTrader: (0)

Stiil not a Merc, but so much better than the E60 which was pathetically bad in side impacts.

BMWs haven't done well in rear collisions (which are a high percentage of accidents) in the past. http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_res...aints.aspx?bmw
But recently all have gotten better.

But good to hear this new testing. The F10 eliminates the major flaw in the past 5ers. Glad that BMW is taking safety seriously now.
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 03:35 PM   #8
numba1guju
Batman
numba1guju's Avatar
5
Rep
483
Posts

 
Drives: bicycle
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: undisclosed

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by E60orBust View Post
"Oh S***, I can't watch this, hey everybody i can't watch this!" - Abe (NWS!)

__________________
SOLD: 2013 328i Mineral Gray ZMM/ZLP/Heated Seats
SOLD: 2002 325i Jet Black ZPP
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 03:54 PM   #9
gorban
Second Lieutenant
Sweden
4
Rep
229
Posts

 
Drives: F11 520xdAT, E87 120dM
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

iTrader: (0)

There are still some very important safety features lacking in the F10. Rear side airbags in the doors (which was available in the E60) and rear safety belts that streches and then losens on impact. This is especially important if you have older kids in the back that doesn't use a child seat anymore. In a severe frontal crash you may end up surviving in the front seat but you children dies in the back. There are plenty of such examples from real life crashes.

Saab, Volvo, Audi, MB, Lexus etc. all have these features and it's a shame that BMW doesn't prioritize this.
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 04:19 PM   #10
kinan_sleiman2006
Lieutenant
kinan_sleiman2006's Avatar
Syria
18
Rep
572
Posts

 
Drives: BMW X3
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Syria-Tartous-Banias-po box299

iTrader: (0)

Perfect safety car..
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 04:46 PM   #11
EdM5
Major
EdM5's Avatar
Netherlands
27
Rep
1,417
Posts

 
Drives: F10 M5 CP & E70 X5 Xdrive35d
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Amsterdam

iTrader: (0)

The roof structure a weak point right?

Check these pix:

http://www.motor-talk.de/forum/schwe...-t2822383.html

Apparently the 535i driver lost the car at high speed in wet conditions and the car rolled a few times. Roof seems okay though.
__________________
2004 e87 118d (ret.), 2006 e92 335d (ret.), 2007 e92 330d (ret.), 2007 e87 130i M-sport (ret.), 2009 e92 M3 (ret.), 2010 f10 535d M-sport (ret.)
2009 e70 X5 35d & 2014 f10 M5 CP
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 05:01 PM   #12
Lukeswarm
Always Warm
Lukeswarm's Avatar
United Kingdom
18
Rep
251
Posts

 
Drives: BMW 318i M-Sport
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lichfield

iTrader: (0)

I can vouch for Mercedes in head on collisions... Not crashed a BMW yet
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 06:00 PM   #13
Oulixes
Lieutenant Colonel
Oulixes's Avatar
19
Rep
1,941
Posts

 
Drives: 330xi, 335i
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Terra Borealis

iTrader: (0)

It is interesting that Hunday is now comparable to Mercedes and BMW in the posted safety parameters.
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 08:09 PM   #14
stickypaws
Dictator
stickypaws's Avatar
21
Rep
1,817
Posts

 
Drives: people crazy
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: where you want to be

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukeswarm View Post
I can vouch for Mercedes in head on collisions... Not crashed a BMW yet
Yet?
Let's hope you aren't ever a test sample.

MB was the first to develop the safety cage concept with crumple zones, seat belt pre-tensioners, traction control, and also the airbag. Although you never hear about that, and Volvo gets a lot of the attention because they advertised their safety records as their trademark. With Benz, it more or less just came with the territory.
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2010, 08:56 PM   #15
gatoman39
Major
gatoman39's Avatar
United_States
45
Rep
1,347
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 E92 335 M-Sport
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWI6 View Post
The roof structure seems to be the weak point in this car as proven in the several crash pictures I have seen. I'm sure it's a safe car, but as another user said, Mercedes is definitively making a safer products with more rigid pillars.
Lets see... C/D just tested the braking distance from 70-0 for the E350 and the 535i.
MB 70-0 183 feet.
BMW 70-0 163 feet.

I will take braking performance over rigid pillars all day and twice on sunday.
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2010, 01:19 PM   #16
Frosty
Lieutenant Colonel
Frosty's Avatar
27
Rep
1,909
Posts

 
Drives: Ordered my E92 (7/10/06)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatoman39 View Post
Lets see... C/D just tested the braking distance from 70-0 for the E350 and the 535i.
MB 70-0 183 feet.
BMW 70-0 163 feet.

I will take braking performance over rigid pillars all day and twice on sunday.
...good point gato ~Frost
__________________
.................................................. ....................
335i Coupe (6MT) (2007: 9/06 build, pre ordered, only owner): Space Grey / Black Leatherette / Grey Poplar trim / ZCW / ZSP / BMW assist w/ bluetooth / power rear shade / navi with iDrive / comfort access keyless entry /+homelink mirror/ 185,000+miles (Nov-25-2014)
.................................................. ......................
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST