*OFFICIAL* general photography conversation thread - Page 161

dcstep · 06-23-2012, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chewy734

Dave,

You might enjoy this review...
http://www.dougbrownphotography.com/...i-has-arrived/

Yes, Doug is an internet friend from birdphotographers.net and a great shooter.

Dave

UdubBadger · 06-23-2012, 11:09 PM

Ok so I went gold level cps.

Suggest I send the lens in for repair right away or estimate (not a 3 day turn around)?

M_Six · 06-25-2012, 07:40 PM

Got a MFA question. How far off is too far? My brand new 85 f1.8 was simply not hitting the focus point. Last night at an awards ceremony I had to switch to the 135L and stand in the back of the room. The images from the 85 weren't even looking sharp on the LCD, so I knew they'd be crap on the laptop. Today I set up a jerry-rigged MFA session in our hotel room and managed to dial in the 85 to what seems to be a sharp focus. But it's an adjustment of -6. Is that acceptable (assuming it really is now hitting focus)? Or should I send it in to Canon for calibration?

Weebl · 06-25-2012, 07:46 PM

If you can get it to focus sharp in your body, I bet Canon will respond that if "falls within specifications".
At least you can MA, I cannot and it sucks.

dcstep · 06-26-2012, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M_Six

Got a MFA question. How far off is too far? My brand new 85 f1.8 was simply not hitting the focus point. Last night at an awards ceremony I had to switch to the 135L and stand in the back of the room. The images from the 85 weren't even looking sharp on the LCD, so I knew they'd be crap on the laptop. Today I set up a jerry-rigged MFA session in our hotel room and managed to dial in the 85 to what seems to be a sharp focus. But it's an adjustment of -6. Is that acceptable (assuming it really is now hitting focus)? Or should I send it in to Canon for calibration?

If it's within the adjustment range, then you're ok. Each camera/lens combination will be different. Also, be sure to adjust for your TC/lens combinations (assuming you're using Canon TCs that'll identify themselves to the camera).

Dave

kamek · 06-28-2012, 02:17 AM

Pulled the trigger, guys.

UdubBadger · 06-28-2012, 08:41 AM

nice

rodi · 06-28-2012, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kamek

Pulled the trigger, guys.

now we'll match!

rodi · 06-30-2012, 04:24 PM

shorty forty.

Chewy734 · 06-30-2012, 04:51 PM

you bought one rodi? how do you like it?

rodi · 06-30-2012, 05:18 PM

perfectly small. a new body cap.
wouldn't dare try to use it for video, not because of the noise, but the form factor does not allow my focusing methods.

UdubBadger · 06-30-2012, 07:32 PM

Received a nice look when the USPS lady asked me how much insurance I wanted on my 5Dmkii and 16-35 2.8L being shipped to CPS.

$3500...

She goes...

Chewy734 · 06-30-2012, 07:54 PM

why did you ship out the 5D2?

UdubBadger · 06-30-2012, 09:12 PM

cleaning

dcstep · 06-30-2012, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodi

shorty forty.

I was thinking about that one. I'm looking forward to some shots.

rodi · 07-01-2012, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcstep

I was thinking about that one. I'm looking forward to some shots.

i'm really liking it. haven't really put it to good use yet, but i'll post stuff as soon as that happens.

dcstep · 07-01-2012, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodi

perfectly small. a new body cap.
wouldn't dare try to use it for video, not because of the noise, but the form factor does not allow my focusing methods.

Canon says:

STM - Continuous Autofocus for Shooting Video

So why not give it a try?

Dave

rodi · 07-01-2012, 11:37 AM

same reason I wouldn't dare use the 85/1.2 for video: it's focus-by-wire.
it's also audible, unlike USM L glass.
it also way too small to wrap fingers around it to pull focus. and impossible to use a follow-focus that doesn't have a reversible gear mount so that the crank clears the body.
but all of these are mute points compared to the focus-by-wire issue.

rodi · 07-01-2012, 11:39 AM

also, I truly believe that the STM moniker is a marketing ploy forthe entry consumer using the Rebels to shoot video an photos of their kids. the new rebel can autofocus in video mode with the new STM. it's not aimed at pros. and this lens is not a pro lens.

dcstep · 07-01-2012, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodi

also, I truly believe that the STM moniker is a marketing ploy forthe entry consumer using the Rebels to shoot video an photos of their kids. the new rebel can autofocus in video mode with the new STM. it's not aimed at pros. and this lens is not a pro lens.

You may be right about the marketing gimic, but I was thinking that we'd see video AF migrate to the pro-sumer level, like the 5D3 and the 7D2.

If it were smooth and accurate, it'd be a boon for some scenes. That's a big IF, I realize.

Dave

kamek · 07-01-2012, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcstep

Canon says:

STM - Continuous Autofocus for Shooting Video

So why not give it a try?

Dave

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcstep

You may be right about the marketing gimic, but I was thinking that we'd see video AF migrate to the pro-sumer level, like the 5D3 and the 7D2.

If it were smooth and accurate, it'd be a boon for some scenes. That's a big IF, I realize.

Dave

Canon confirmed that there won't be continuous auto-focus for the 5D3. It was confirmed with the release of the newest firmware that added support for the 40mm.

rodi · 07-01-2012, 01:55 PM

I think it's hard to realize for anyone who does not shoot video professionally, that autofocus for video is not welcomed, needed or desired.

06-25-2012, 07:40 PM	#3523
M_Six Free Thinker Drives: 2005 X5 3.0 & 2006 Z4 3.0si Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Charleston, IL Posts: 3,985 iTrader: (0) Garage List 2005 X5 3.0 [0.00] 2006 Z4 3.0si [0.00]	Got a MFA question. How far off is too far? My brand new 85 f1.8 was simply not hitting the focus point. Last night at an awards ceremony I had to switch to the 135L and stand in the back of the room. The images from the 85 weren't even looking sharp on the LCD, so I knew they'd be crap on the laptop. Today I set up a jerry-rigged MFA session in our hotel room and managed to dial in the 85 to what seems to be a sharp focus. But it's an adjustment of -6. Is that acceptable (assuming it really is now hitting focus)? Or should I send it in to Canon for calibration? __________________ Mark - Randomography "The $0.99 menu was put on this Earth for a good damn reason." -Weebl

06-25-2012, 07:46 PM	#3524
Weebl Weebl wobbles but eats Pie Drives: 2008 335i, 2000 740i Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 1,242 iTrader: (0)	If you can get it to focus sharp in your body, I bet Canon will respond that if "falls within specifications". At least you can MA, I cannot and it sucks. __________________ Kevin Kevingoto.smugmug.com 2000 740i-Annalisa and 2008 335i-Weebl. Weebl may wobble but has DTC mods HPFP,4 new injectors,1 transfer pump assembly,front wheel bearings A few E9X Nerd points

06-28-2012, 02:17 AM	#3526
kamek Brigadier General Drives: 328xi 6MT Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Queens, NY Posts: 3,152 iTrader: (4) Garage List 2008 BMW 328xi [4.10]	Pulled the trigger, guys. __________________ E92 328xi \| KW \| AA \| LUX \| OEM 359M \| BMW Performance Exhaust

06-30-2012, 04:24 PM	#3529
rodi . . . Drives: your FACE! Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Atlanta proper Posts: 2,391 iTrader: (-1)	shorty forty. Attached Images __________________ 2009 135i \| space grey \| sport \| navi \| hifi \| heated dinan stage 2 software \| bmw performance exhaust kw v2 \| hotchkis front sway \| vmr v710

06-30-2012, 04:51 PM	#3530
Chewy734 Major General Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Cleveland, OH Posts: 6,603 iTrader: (15)	you bought one rodi? how do you like it? __________________ Currently for sale: N/A

06-23-2012, 11:09 PM	#3522
UdubBadger Banned Drives: '04 330i ZHP Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Chicago Burbs Posts: 24,714 iTrader: (22) Garage List 2004 BMW 330i ZHP [4.75] 2011 135i [3.73] 2008 328xi [4.38]	Ok so I went gold level cps. Suggest I send the lens in for repair right away or estimate (not a 3 day turn around)?

06-28-2012, 08:41 AM	#3527
UdubBadger Banned Drives: '04 330i ZHP Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Chicago Burbs Posts: 24,714 iTrader: (22) Garage List 2004 BMW 330i ZHP [4.75] 2011 135i [3.73] 2008 328xi [4.38]	nice

06-30-2012, 05:18 PM	#3531
rodi . . . Drives: your FACE! Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Atlanta proper Posts: 2,391 iTrader: (-1)	perfectly small. a new body cap. wouldn't dare try to use it for video, not because of the noise, but the form factor does not allow my focusing methods. __________________ 2009 135i \| space grey \| sport \| navi \| hifi \| heated dinan stage 2 software \| bmw performance exhaust kw v2 \| hotchkis front sway \| vmr v710

06-30-2012, 07:32 PM	#3532
UdubBadger Banned Drives: '04 330i ZHP Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Chicago Burbs Posts: 24,714 iTrader: (22) Garage List 2004 BMW 330i ZHP [4.75] 2011 135i [3.73] 2008 328xi [4.38]	Received a nice look when the USPS lady asked me how much insurance I wanted on my 5Dmkii and 16-35 2.8L being shipped to CPS. $3500... She goes...

06-30-2012, 07:54 PM	#3533
Chewy734 Major General Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Cleveland, OH Posts: 6,603 iTrader: (15)	why did you ship out the 5D2? __________________ Currently for sale: N/A

06-30-2012, 09:12 PM	#3534
UdubBadger Banned Drives: '04 330i ZHP Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Chicago Burbs Posts: 24,714 iTrader: (22) Garage List 2004 BMW 330i ZHP [4.75] 2011 135i [3.73] 2008 328xi [4.38]	cleaning

07-01-2012, 11:37 AM	#3538
rodi . . . Drives: your FACE! Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Atlanta proper Posts: 2,391 iTrader: (-1)	same reason I wouldn't dare use the 85/1.2 for video: it's focus-by-wire. it's also audible, unlike USM L glass. it also way too small to wrap fingers around it to pull focus. and impossible to use a follow-focus that doesn't have a reversible gear mount so that the crank clears the body. but all of these are mute points compared to the focus-by-wire issue. __________________ 2009 135i \| space grey \| sport \| navi \| hifi \| heated dinan stage 2 software \| bmw performance exhaust kw v2 \| hotchkis front sway \| vmr v710

07-01-2012, 11:39 AM	#3539
rodi . . . Drives: your FACE! Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Atlanta proper Posts: 2,391 iTrader: (-1)	also, I truly believe that the STM moniker is a marketing ploy forthe entry consumer using the Rebels to shoot video an photos of their kids. the new rebel can autofocus in video mode with the new STM. it's not aimed at pros. and this lens is not a pro lens. __________________ 2009 135i \| space grey \| sport \| navi \| hifi \| heated dinan stage 2 software \| bmw performance exhaust kw v2 \| hotchkis front sway \| vmr v710

07-01-2012, 01:55 PM	#3542
rodi . . . Drives: your FACE! Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Atlanta proper Posts: 2,391 iTrader: (-1)	I think it's hard to realize for anyone who does not shoot video professionally, that autofocus for video is not welcomed, needed or desired. __________________ 2009 135i \| space grey \| sport \| navi \| hifi \| heated dinan stage 2 software \| bmw performance exhaust kw v2 \| hotchkis front sway \| vmr v710

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search