M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > BMW M5 (F10) General Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-21-2011, 05:17 PM   #1
Jason
Administrator
Jason's Avatar
United_States
40107
Rep
21,227
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Post BMW F10 M5 First Drive Review - Insideline: Better Overall Than E60 M5

BIMMERPOST NEWS
BMW F10 M5 First Drive Review - Insideline: Better Overall Than E60 M5
32
COMMENTS
Name:  2.jpg
Views: 12851
Size:  53.2 KB

The first drive reviews of the F10 M5 have begun rolling in. Edmunds Insideline has just posted their first impressions of BMW's newest M5. Their verdict? They call the F10 M5 a better overall sport sedan compared to the E60.

The more interesting comments are posted below, but head over to Insideline for the full review.



You can find all official F10 M5 specs, details, and links to other reviews at:

[Official M5 Info/Review List Thread]
[S63Tu Engine Specs]



Quote:
It's down on displacement, more efficient and cleaner-burning, yet somehow it's still a ridiculously fast sport sedan that gives up nothing to its V10 predecessor.

Compared to the previous M5, power rises from an even 500 horses to 560 horsepower at 6,000 rpm. The maximum torque rating remains unchanged at 501 pound-feet, but its arrival starts at a mere 1,500 rpm compared to the V10's late 6,100 torque peak. BMW claims the extra power drops the M5's 0-62-mph time from 4.7 seconds to just 4.4 seconds.

But even that doesn't describe how much faster the new car feels on the road. That huge spread of torque means the effective rev range is much broader than the old car's. The V10's midrange pull was never as weak as detractors made out, but a big overtaking maneuver always meant dropping a couple of gears. Not any longer.

So, a win-win situation then? Almost. All that power means fewer trips to the redline because, well, you don't really need to bother. It's less work, but there's less reward. More importantly, the V8 doesn't sound anywhere near as special as the old V10.
Name:  1.jpg
Views: 11470
Size:  59.3 KB

Quote:
The new dual-clutch setup is smooth, quick, and makes the engine feel much more responsive than it does in the X5 M and X6 M, both of which make do with a traditional torque-converter-equipped automatic gearbox. But if you enjoyed the slightly scary sensation of the old M5 banging through the gears flat out, you might be surprised to find this one changes without much drama.
Quote:
But just because this M car is easier to drive slowly doesn't mean it's not huge fun to drive fast. It might have had to bow down to the engine downsizing trend, but the M department hasn't rolled over completely.

The steering is still hydraulically assisted rather than electrically driven, as on the other 5 Series cars. And you won't find a set of run-flat tires under the arches, just proper high-performance rubber. There's even a set of six-pot fixed calipers behind the front wheels, replacing the old M5's sliding caliper brakes.

Compared to the old V10 M5 and the current standard 5 Series, this one has a grittier feel to its steering. It gives you a far clearer sense of what's going on down at the front wheels and feels much more precise just off center as you first tip the M5 into a bend. You need that precision, too, because at just 2.6 turns lock-to-lock, the new rack is quick (if not as swift as a normal 5 with active steering) and points the nose into corners with much more enthusiasm. And that's despite a 253-pound increase in curb weight to 4,123 pounds.
Name:  3.jpg
Views: 11912
Size:  74.2 KB

Quote:
The ride is surprisingly good whichever damper mode you choose. Traction is impressive, too, in part thanks to a brand-new fully active M differential, which uses sensors around the car to decide how to apportion the torque across the rear axle for maximum bite.
Name:  5.jpg
Views: 11664
Size:  77.0 KB

Quote:
If some of the M5's wilder character traits have disappeared in the metamorphosis from E60 to F10, then so have the rough edges. The brakes feel stronger, the performance is more usable and, if the engine is slightly less exciting, the improved chassis and much longer touring range makes up for it. It's all about efficiency these days, remember?

It's a shame the V10 had to go. We're unlikely to see an engine like that again. But the new 2012 BMW M5 is more than just a great engine, it's a better overall sport sedan.
[/size]
Name:  4.jpg
Views: 11429
Size:  90.8 KB


Head over to Insideline for the full review.

Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 05:54 PM   #2
SleepyE90
Lieutenant
SleepyE90's Avatar
United_States
26
Rep
506
Posts

Drives: Bavarian
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: GhettoBird Metrolpolis

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insideline View Post
Compared to the previous M5, power rises from an even 500 horses to 560 horsepower at 6,000 rpm. The maximum torque rating remains unchanged at 501 pound-feet, but its arrival starts at a mere 1,500 rpm compared to the V10's late 6,100 torque peak. BMW claims the extra power drops the M5's 0-62-mph time from 4.7 seconds to just 4.4 seconds.
Is this a joke? The S85 V10 only made 384 lb ft of torque (6100rpm).

Other than that, the F10 is a beast and I can't wait to get behind the wheel of one. BMW may have fazed out a great N/A engine but the FI one that replaced it sure is worthy.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 05:59 PM   #3
Moo
Gold Member
Moo's Avatar
No_Country
161
Rep
512
Posts

Drives: PSYWGN
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Studio 69

iTrader: (0)

How did it lose 2 cylinders and gain 253 lbs?

Is that the same direction M3/4's are headed toward?

Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:08 PM   #4
TheBingoBalls
Brigadier General
TheBingoBalls's Avatar
Canada
3799
Rep
4,653
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
The first of many (great) reviews. Love the comment about the steering and feedback from the road. Looks like the F10 M5 is going to be another winner (like there was an doubt...).

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperlativE90 View Post
Is this a joke? The S85 V10 only made 384 lb ft of torque (6100rpm).

Other than that, the F10 is a beast and I can't wait to get behind the wheel of one. BMW may have fazed out a great N/A engine but the FI one that replaced it sure is worthy.
Yeah, the E60 M5 only had around 380 lb ft...don't know what's up with that comment.
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:08 PM   #5
graves4r6
Captain
graves4r6's Avatar
53
Rep
765
Posts

Drives: Bicycle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Heaven on earth

iTrader: (14)

It has newer technology and of course it's better...than E60 M5..
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:09 PM   #6
numba1guju
Lieutenant
numba1guju's Avatar
25
Rep
488
Posts

Drives: 2015 VW Jetta
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperlativE90 View Post
Is this a joke? The S85 V10 only made 384 lb ft of torque (6100rpm).

Other than that, the F10 is a beast and I can't wait to get behind the wheel of one. BMW may have fazed out a great N/A engine but the FI one that replaced it sure is worthy.
they probably confused it for Newton meters of e60? lol
__________________
SOLD: 2013 328i Mineral Gray ZMM/ZLP/Heated Seats
SOLD: 2002 325i Jet Black ZPP
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:34 PM   #7
Sedan_Clan
Law Enforcer
Sedan_Clan's Avatar
Brazil
24703
Rep
22,191
Posts

Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!

iTrader: (26)

I'm not surprised that the car drives well.
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:36 PM   #8
-=Hot|Ice=-
Been There, Done That.
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
United_States
639
Rep
4,728
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo View Post
How did it lose 2 cylinders and gain 253 lbs?

Is that the same direction M3/4's are headed toward?

I don't doubt it. Seems like BMW worked it's magic with the M5. Now do it with the next M3.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypod View Post
You sound like my buddies who have AMG's - Slam the gas, slam the brakes...
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:36 PM   #9
TheBingoBalls
Brigadier General
TheBingoBalls's Avatar
Canada
3799
Rep
4,653
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan View Post
I'm not surprised that the car drives well.
Can't wait for the Top Gear/Fifth Gear reviews.

(*goes back and watches the E60 review.*)
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:36 PM   #10
BCA
Captain
21
Rep
793
Posts

Drives: 2015 M3
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo View Post
How did it lose 2 cylinders and gain 253 lbs?

Is that the same direction M3/4's are headed toward?

From what I understand, the E60 and previous 5ers were largely based on the 3 series platforms, whereas the F10 is based on the F01 7 series platform. That has a lot to do with the weight gain and the comments that the F10 feels like a boat compared to the E60.

I would guess that the F80 M3/4 will not see nearly as significant a weight gain. Let's hope that there isn't any weight gain! Wishful thinking, I know...
__________________
2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S
2019 Porsche Cayenne

Past BMWs: 2015 M3, 2014 550i, 2013 M3 ZCP, 2012 535i, 2011 E90 335i, 2009 E90 M3, 2008 X5, 2006 330i, 2004 330i
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:39 PM   #11
Sedan_Clan
Law Enforcer
Sedan_Clan's Avatar
Brazil
24703
Rep
22,191
Posts

Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!

iTrader: (26)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 宝马.e90 View Post
Can't wait for the Top Gear/Fifth Gear reviews.

(*goes back and watches the E60 review.*)
You and I both! I have my DVR set to record. Schwinggg!
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:39 PM   #12
-=Hot|Ice=-
Been There, Done That.
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
United_States
639
Rep
4,728
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCA View Post
From what I understand, the E60 and previous 5ers were largely based on the 3 series platforms, whereas the F10 is based on the F01 7 series platform. That has a lot to do with the weight gain and the comments that the F10 feels like a boat compared to the E60.

I would guess that the F80 M3/4 will not see nearly as significant a weight gain. Let's hope that there isn't any weight gain! Wishful thinking, I know...
Scott claims there will be extensive use of CF. We'll see.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypod View Post
You sound like my buddies who have AMG's - Slam the gas, slam the brakes...
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 06:46 PM   #13
Rez
Private
Rez's Avatar
United_States
25
Rep
81
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

Wow, who is the idiot writing this review, he does not even know the cars he is comparing
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 07:26 PM   #14
bavarian19
General
bavarian19's Avatar
United_States
516
Rep
18,858
Posts

Drives: Car
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VA

iTrader: (23)

nice!
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 07:38 PM   #15
GOLFFRR
GOLFFRR's Avatar
10687
Rep
27,506
Posts

Drives: GOLFFRR cart
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: we sell BMWs to "ALL" US states

iTrader: (4)

^^+1
__________________

BEFORE YOU BUY YOUR NEXT BMW, PM ME FIRST WE CAN HOOK YOU UP!
Jimmy Miller:Jimmym@bmwofcamarillo.com Cell:805-509-2048
If you have any issues getting a hold of Jimmy M PLEASE PM me, I'm available everyday till 545pm!
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 08:02 PM   #16
F36_CB1K
Private
F36_CB1K's Avatar
United_States
18
Rep
92
Posts

Drives: F36
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (0)

Quote:

(*goes back and watches the E60 review.*)
Which S??E??
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 08:14 PM   #17
TheBingoBalls
Brigadier General
TheBingoBalls's Avatar
Canada
3799
Rep
4,653
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by E9292121 View Post
Which S??E??
YouTube. Official channels too.

Every time I watch the review, I keep telling myself the M button is just full of awesomeness
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 08:23 PM   #18
TheBingoBalls
Brigadier General
TheBingoBalls's Avatar
Canada
3799
Rep
4,653
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by MERCSUk153 View Post
I think for me the key is that it has hydraulic steering and no runflat tires!
Now only if they can do something about the weight.
I've been wanting to test drive a F10 for this reason. I've driven an E60 and although I prefer the steering of the 3er, I still found the E60 5er still enjoyable. Is the F10 worse than the E60? How does it compare?
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 08:26 PM   #19
Crisp
Lieutenant Colonel
Crisp's Avatar
Albania
400
Rep
1,777
Posts

Drives: F95 X5M
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NYC

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by E9292121 View Post
Which S??E??
Just google it or write on YouTube "e60 m5 top gear". That's how I find it. Love that video.



---------------------------

Not too happy with the new M5 though. I like the E60 body better because it looks much more aggressive. The S85 is a dream.
I'm not too worried about fuel economy when I'm looking at a $100k 500hp+ car honestly. It's nice if the economy is there but not at the expense of response/power/sound.

I guess third party tuners will take over and bring this beast up to 600-650hp easily so that should be enough to win me over eventually. For now, the M5 still holds a special place for me
__________________
Current F95 X5M; E60 M5 6spd; Mclaren 570s; Aston Martin Vantage; Ferrari FF
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 08:34 PM   #20
Crisp
Lieutenant Colonel
Crisp's Avatar
Albania
400
Rep
1,777
Posts

Drives: F95 X5M
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NYC

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by 宝马.e90 View Post
I've been wanting to test drive a F10 for this reason. I've driven an E60 and although I prefer the steering of the 3er, I still found the E60 5er still enjoyable. Is the F10 worse than the E60? How does it compare?
I have an e60 now and brought it in for service 2 days ago. I've been riding in an F10 535i x drive.

The steering is so freaking light. It feels like they are going towards the Lexus feel. I thought my steering was light on the E60, but this thing is on a different level.

I prefer the steering on a 3rd also. Much crisper and more responsive, but they are completely different cars.

I think the F10 was more of a move towards luxury than performance. The car feels too smooth and numb compared to the E60. It depends what you prefer.

I have also driven the F10 535i at an auto-x event. Thought the same.

On a side note, it got a lot more attention and compliments on the road....I was surprised since it's only a 5 series, no exhaust, nothing flashy on it. (lol)
__________________
Current F95 X5M; E60 M5 6spd; Mclaren 570s; Aston Martin Vantage; Ferrari FF
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 08:42 PM   #21
Q4P
Colonel
Q4P's Avatar
United_States
83
Rep
2,291
Posts

Drives: Too Much
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: World

iTrader: (0)

I believe it's a better car overall and I love the way it looks and the TQ bump that it has received. I dislike the extra weight, worse exhaust noise and engine sound that it has received.

My overall feelings will be displayed when I get a chance to drive it and feel the steering response, I hope it's not like a regular 5 series, but I honestly doubt that it is.
__________________
2jZ + RB26 + 4G63 + LS9 + N54 =
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2011, 08:44 PM   #22
aajami
Brigadier General
aajami's Avatar
United_States
430
Rep
4,567
Posts

Drives: Space Gray '09 E92 M3
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo View Post
How did it lose 2 cylinders and gain 253 lbs?

Is that the same direction M3/4's are headed toward?

Most likely. The only car company that's really waging a war on weight is VAG. Many of the newer models coming out underneath the VW, Audi, Porsche, and Lamborghini flags are lighter than the outgoing models they're replacing.
__________________
'09 E92 M3: Space Gray, Black, Carbon Leather | ZTP 2MK ZPP 2MT 6FL | link 1 / link 2
Mods: M Performance exhaust | ZCP retrofit | Euro airbox | GTS DCT flash | JPN 240 ECU flash | Euro LCI taillights | CRT lip | OEM alarm retrofit | Space Gray bumper plugs | BMW Performance: Mk. II spoiler / Mk. II non-electronic steering wheel / mirror caps / front grilles / side gills / intake louvers / emblem
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2012 m5 forum, 2012 m5 forums, 2012 m5 review, 2012 m5 reviews, 2013 m5 review, 2013 m5 reviews, bmw 2012 m5 review, bmw 2012 m5 reviews, bmw f10 m5 review, bmw f10 m5 reviews, bmw m5 forum, bmw m5 forums, bmw m5 review, bmw m5 reviews, f10 e60 m5 compared, f10 e60 m5 comparison, f10 e60 m5 review, f10 m5 e60 m5 compared, f10 m5 e60 m5 comparison, f10 m5 e60 m5 review, f10 m5 forum, f10 m5 forums, f10 m5 review, f10 m5 reviews, f10 m5 versus e60 m5, f10 m5 vs e60 m5, f10 versus e60 m5, f10 vs e60 m5, m5 review, m5 reviews, new m5 forums, new m5 review, new m5 reviews

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 PM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST