Quote:
Originally Posted by dunderhi
Misunderstandings usually have two very different perspectives. From my perspective, I thought you were being confrontational with an outrageous performance claim and I called you on it - no insult intended, no sarcasm. If your (misperceived) claim was true, it truly would have put BB's results in a new perspective for me. Same for the 100 Cetane requirement; a tune that only needs 93 Cetane can't compete with a tune that requires 100 Cetane. Likewise, after rereading your post, it still looks like you called me a troll whether or not you qualified it as being childish. I read it as you launched a personal attack against me and then tried to take the high road, so as not to look bad. As I said, two very different perspectives. It's all cleared up now, so no hard feelings.
BTW, if you had produced a stock 12.4 timeslip, you would have had me bowing in respect.  |
No hard feelings -- miscommunication happens.
