Quote:
Originally Posted by MKSixer
Sorry but you are incorrect. In legal terms, predominantly at fault means that fault is shared with another. This is a legal ruling and it wasn't the wind or track conditions which was being adjudicated. It's even in the legal description of the incident: "Incident between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen is being investigated by the stewards." Had track conditions been to blame or a gust of wind, the stewards would have mentioned it. Max shares blame in this as well and it isn't speculative.
|
BLABLABLABLABLA again you think you can speak for the FIA.
Of course you know better.....
Yes it's an incident between 2 cars. Doesnt mean 'legal' blablabla is binding. This is not a court of law....
Fact is that the FIA didn't elaborate on this AND didnt penalize Max.
So everything you say is pure speculation. As usual you think you can speak for the FIA.
Nothing changes here....
I'm glad Max showed once again that he can win from Mercedes and Hamilton without the dirty tricks we've seen Mercedes displaying at silverstone and the hungaroring.
Max wins because he's faster, not because he's lowering his standards. And that makes him a great driver.