|
|
|
2010 2011 BMW 5 Series Forum F10 Autocar slags F10 ride without VDC |
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-26-2010, 06:25 AM | #155 |
Major General
1208
Rep 8,034
Posts |
I tested both stock and VDC on 18" and on 19". On the 18" the difference is still noticeable but on 19" there is a marked difference so I can only imagine that on rims sizes greater than 19" the VDC is a definite, of course this is all in my opinion but I would seriously test drive both setups if you are looking at the 19" or above.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 06:54 AM | #156 |
Registered
0
Rep 4
Posts |
Ride quality: a matter of personal taste
I follow the discussion on the ride quality of the F10 with great interest. I currently drive a 525i E60 (218 pk 2007 pre-facelift) with manual 6-speed transmission on 17-inch runflats. I consider the ride quality as good, not great. Since for me handling has a lower priority than ride quality I am seriously considering buying the F10 528i with the dynamic damping control (option 223).
@Erasmus: my dealer checked the user's manual of the car and with option 223 it is possible by means of a switch button to select Comfort - Normal - Sport (not Sport +). I have read almost every available review of the new F10 (both on the internet and in car magazines) and it appears that ride quality is a very subjective matter. An example: in Auto Motor und Sport (Issue 9, 9 April 2010) the 535i (with Adaptive Drive) and MB E350 CGI were compared. The magazine gave 22 out of 25 for "Federung leer" to the BMW, and 23 out of 25 for the MB. In Auto Bild (issue 11, 19 March 2010) the 530d (with Adaptive Drive) and MB E350 CDI were compared. They gave 19 out of 20 for "Federung" to the BMW and 16 out of 20 to the MB. So according to AMS the MB is more comfy than the BMW whereas Auto Bild says the opposite. Maybe we are looking for "a sheep with five legs" (Dutch expression for looking for the impossible): the handling of a true BMW with the comfort of a true Mercedes. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 07:26 AM | #157 |
Private
4
Rep 88
Posts |
Hoi Cees, are you sure about this one? When you use the car configurator on bmw.nl and select the Damper Control (223) with standard automatic gearbox, does it show the select button on the dash? (the sport auto together with the sport steering wheel already give a swith button sport-normal)
__________________
The natural state isn't preferable ...
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 08:03 AM | #158 |
Registered
0
Rep 4
Posts |
Option 223: Dynamic Damping Control
Hoi Erasmus: I tried the configurator for the F10 on www.bmw.nl, but it says "shortly you will be able to configure in detail your new BMW 5-series" suggesting that the configurator for the F10 is not yet ready.
I studied myself the dynamic damping control in the user's manual of the F10 at my dealer. The manual shows a switch button next to the gear lever. It looks just like the button Sport-Normal you were referring to, but it has an extra setting Comfort. I look forward to hear about your experience with your new 528i on standard suspension especially in comparison to the ride quality of your current E61. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 08:11 AM | #159 | ||
Lieutenant General
6545
Rep 15,857
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
HighlandPete |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 08:18 AM | #160 | |
Private
4
Rep 88
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
The natural state isn't preferable ...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 02:19 PM | #161 | |
Private
4
Rep 88
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
The natural state isn't preferable ...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 02:33 PM | #162 | |
Second Lieutenant
11
Rep 229
Posts |
Quote:
The configurator isn't always 100 % correct in it's visual representation of the selected options. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2010, 02:48 PM | #163 | |
Lieutenant General
6545
Rep 15,857
Posts |
Quote:
This is from the UK brochure and is confirmed by BMW Product Marketing. Note to which options DDC comes as part of the kit. Definitely comes with 223 HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2010, 06:40 AM | #164 | |
Registered
0
Rep 4
Posts |
Option 223
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2010, 01:57 PM | #165 | |
Private
4
Rep 88
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
The natural state isn't preferable ...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2010, 06:37 AM | #166 | |
Lieutenant General
6545
Rep 15,857
Posts |
Quote:
HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2010, 09:38 AM | #167 |
General
42
Rep 683
Posts |
Autoexpress rates F10 with without chassis tricks higher than Merc E and Audi A6
Without its additional Adaptive Drive goodies, the 5-Series lacks that sparkling balance between ride and handling. However, it still manages to set the dynamic benchmark in this competitive sector. Sharp steering, huge levels of grip and beautifully weighted controls are blended with a comfortable ride and class-leading refinement http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carrevi..._to_drive.html
__________________
2010 E90 335i M-Sport, 2005 E90 325i M-Sport, 2003 E60 520i, 2002 E46 330i Sport II, 2000 E46 325i Sport I, 1999 E46 318i, 1998 E46 323i SE, 1996 E36 323i SE, 1996 E34 518i, 1995 E36 320iA, 1994 E36 316i
Last edited by carl_d; 04-28-2010 at 10:22 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2010, 01:07 PM | #168 | |
Private First Class
1
Rep 109
Posts |
Quote:
Full extract below. QUOTE Which is best to drive? Expectations are extremely high here, with customers wanting the latest hi-tech aids to deliver a refined, exciting and engaging driving experience April 2010 These models have to master every skill in the book. Customer expectations are sky-high in this class, with buyers demanding cars which are comfortable and refined, yet engaging and fun. Traditionally, BMW has managed to inject its large saloons with more involvement and sharper handling than rivals, and the latest model doesn’t disappoint. When we drove the car on its European launch, it raised the class’s dynamic bar even higher, handling with superb poise. It achieved this while striking a near perfect balance between taut responses and ride comfort. That car featured the manufacturer’s clever Adaptive Drive set-up, which proved to be very effective. It is a £2,220 option, and includes variable dampers and active anti-roll bars. However, the model tested here doesn’t have these important additions – so has that changed our opinion? On bumpy UK roads and fitted with larger, optional, 18-inch wheels, the suspension fidgets over rough surfaces more than cars boasting the variable damper technology, but the ride is still accomplished. It is smoother than the Audi and, while the air-sprung E-Class is well cushioned on the motorway, the trade-off in terms of body control makes the BMW the best compromise of the trio. Body control is predictably tighter with active roll bars fitted, but the new 5-Series is still the class leader when it comes to cornering composure. Get caught out by a tightening bend, or encounter a big bump, and the BMW maintains its poise where the Mercedes bounces and fidgets. On twisty roads, the 5-Series turns into corners with precision and sharpness. In contrast, the E-Class (fitted with the £1,395 AirMATIC suspension) suffers from slower-witted steering. And it is never as agile or responsive as the BMW. The Audi’s over-light steering can’t rival the 5-Series for feedback and feel. However, thanks to tighter body control than the E350, it’s more reassuring than the Mercedes when driven hard. It also provides the security of four-wheel drive, although the 530d’s impressive mechanical grip means a lack of traction will be an issue only in slippery conditions. Even then, the efficient stability control system can be relied on to keep things in check. In fact, it’s testament to the levels of grip the BMW’s chassis generates that the Mercedes calls upon its traction control more frequently than its sportier rival. Aside from some judder through the firm walls of the BMW’s run-flat tyres, the 5-Series’ ride is impressively comfortable, too. Its cabin shuts out noise so effectively, it is the most refined car here. The Audi isn’t as hushed or settled at high speed as either of its opponents, but still makes a fine executive saloon. And quattro four-wheel drive adds to its all-weather prowess. BMW: 4 stars Without its additional Adaptive Drive goodies, the 5-Series lacks that sparkling balance between ride and handling. However, it still manages to set the dynamic benchmark in this competitive sector. Sharp steering, huge levels of grip and beautifully weighted controls are blended with a comfortable ride and class-leading refinement. Mercedes: 3 stars The E-Class lacks the dynamic precision of the 5-Series. With slower steering, less grip and extra body roll, it never feels as agile. Even though our car has air-suspension, it’s still matched by the BMW when it comes to overall refinement. Sport models get a stiffer set-up, but in Avantgarde trim the Mercedes simply feels cumbersome in this company. Audi: 3 stars Decent body control and reassuring grip ensure four-wheel-drive Audi isn’t totally outclassed here. The trouble is, over rough surfaces the suspension lets shudders into the cabin and the steering is too light and lacks feedback. The over-assisted, sharp brakes are not especially progressive, and recorded the longest stopping distances of our trio. UNQUOTE Last edited by bimmernic; 04-28-2010 at 01:24 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2010, 02:19 PM | #169 |
General
42
Rep 683
Posts |
Autoexpress also tested against the XF in an earlier issue and the F10 won - just.
The Jaguar used to set the dynamic benchmark in this class, but thanks to its mixture of finesse and refinement, the BMW raises the bar. Not only does it handle with the poise and balance we’ve come to expect from the firm, but it also provides superior comfort and refinement. On twisty roads, its front tyres generate huge amounts of grip, and if you get caught out by a tightening bend, or surprised by an unexpected bump, it maintains its composure with superb body control. Then, when you hit the motorway, the supple suspension provides the kind of soothing ride comfort the Jaguar can’t match. However, our test car was fitted with optional Adaptive Drive (£2,220). It combines with the standard Dynamic Drive Control, which provides three chassis settings (Normal, Sport and Sport+) and adds a Comfort mode, variable dampers and active anti-roll bars to improve body control. Read more: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carrevi...#ixzz0mQNMhigM
__________________
2010 E90 335i M-Sport, 2005 E90 325i M-Sport, 2003 E60 520i, 2002 E46 330i Sport II, 2000 E46 325i Sport I, 1999 E46 318i, 1998 E46 323i SE, 1996 E36 323i SE, 1996 E34 518i, 1995 E36 320iA, 1994 E36 316i
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-28-2010, 04:00 PM | #170 |
Lieutenant General
6545
Rep 15,857
Posts |
So when we read the full Auto Express report for the standard car we get "the suspension fidgets over rough surfaces " and "some judder through the firm walls of the BMW’s run-flat tyres" and "without its additional Adaptive Drive goodies, the 5-Series lacks that sparkling balance between ride and handling".
So my drives did find out some imperfections on the basic car? Both the above are alarm bells to me, for day to day driving. The test against the XF was NOT the basic car, but one with Adaptive Drive and the sport autobox. I hope that combination will be better than the Jaguar XF in standard form, or BMW have lost it. HighlandPete |
Appreciate
0
|
04-29-2010, 01:29 PM | #171 | |
Private
4
Rep 88
Posts |
Quote:
I rest my case.
__________________
The natural state isn't preferable ...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2010, 05:17 AM | #172 |
Private First Class
1
Rep 109
Posts |
HighlandPete, hope you don't mind but I thought it would be useful to share what you had posted on the other forum (http://www.bmwland.co.uk/talker/view...06218&start=80) where you had expanded on your observations from your two test drives with the 18" and 19" wheel setups:
Quote Bob, having read this thread, you have clearly sensed we are being very critical of this new model, the reason, the E60/1 cars have to a degree, disappointed many hardcore users. The reason being as Agh! has commented, is all about run-flat tyres which have meant a set of compromises in the car’s dynamics. To many of us this has meant the cars are not one thing, or the other. I’ll explain, the standard cars, SE models were at launch found to be very ‘bouncy’ and ‘crashy’ on less than perfect roads. The M-sport models were rock hard and far too firm for many users, once off the best of surfaces. The models were improved with the LCI (facelift models) but still not totally sorted, wheel size and tyres make a lot of difference to the way the cars work on all types of roads. So we are looking for a sorted chassis in the latest cars, F10/11 models. The F10 is a superb car, no doubt about it, as I said at the beginning a very good place to be. I’d have one tomorrow, specced correctly. But looking to the 520d as you are, you will be getting a good car, in fact you could be perfectly happy after your past experiences in motors, find it streets ahead of anything you have driven long term. You mention the auto, I’d think hard about taking the sport box option, the cost is small for the features you get. Besides the steering wheel paddles you get the DDC (Dynamic Drive Control) which means you can tighten the steering feel. A good move in my view. As to the suspension, the view is M-sport suspension is much more comfortable than the E60 models and possibly the best package will be M-sport suspension with 17” wheels, to get the balance of chassis control with the best comfort levels. There are guys who have investigated this and feel the M-sport suspension is set between the 'normal' and 'sport' setting of the VDC models. This is reported to be confirmed by BMW themselves. So a lot will depend on what you want from the car, my own concern would be for standard suspension and 17” wheels, what sort of ride quality will it have over a range of road conditions? Will it feel composed, or tend towards the softer bouncy ride of the E60 cars? It certainly will be better than the E60, no one disputes that fact. In my original report I tested two different car setups. Since that time I’ve investigated it more, as something didn’t add up from more reading and other forum discussions. I had another visit to the garage, where we got BMW involved, to explain exactly what was on the 535i demo car with the DDC and 19” wheels. It turns out the car only had the sport box (2TB) and 19” wheels, which were different from the standard 530d demo car. So just the slightest spec' change with the ability to tighten the steering, and wheels which appear to run a different frequency over the same roads, can transform the way a car drives. I’ve still to try the full Adaptive Drive package, supposedly designed around the 18” wheel set, but we will see if that is the best, as more reports come back. 20” wheels are definitely getting the thumbs down for drive quality, but there is still varied feedback on how 18” vs. 19” work on the different suspension packages. On reflection, if I was looking at a 520d, I’d be looking to have the sport box (2TB, includes Drive Dynamic Control), M-sport suspension and 17” wheels. My only question would be on the wheel sizing, but that is more due to my previous experience, and at present, do not know what the best wheel size is for the F10. Hope this does help, at least a little. Wink Peter Unquote |
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2010, 05:18 AM | #173 | |
Private First Class
1
Rep 109
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2010, 05:56 AM | #174 | |
S0THPAW
8943
Rep 7,860
Posts |
Quote:
Same here. I have to wait another 4 weeks. (Dus snel 'n beetje met die foto's van die boot en de skyline van Rotterdam op de achtergrond) Cheers Robin |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2010, 07:33 AM | #175 | |
Captain
195
Rep 850
Posts |
Quote:
Highland Pete, as regards the M sport suspension being between normal and sport - is this based on what TGII said? Why did you recommend the M sport and 17 inch wheels pls? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2010, 11:22 AM | #176 | |
General
42
Rep 683
Posts |
Quote:
I would not assume 17" wheels are better as its likey M-Sport is tunned for 18" wheels - we have yet to get clear position on this?
__________________
2010 E90 335i M-Sport, 2005 E90 325i M-Sport, 2003 E60 520i, 2002 E46 330i Sport II, 2000 E46 325i Sport I, 1999 E46 318i, 1998 E46 323i SE, 1996 E36 323i SE, 1996 E34 518i, 1995 E36 320iA, 1994 E36 316i
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|