|
|
|
2010 2011 BMW 5 Series Forum F10 BMWUSA.com specs say F10 550i gets 17/25 MPG?? |
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
05-03-2010, 04:19 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
53
Rep 133
Posts |
BMWUSA.com specs say F10 550i gets 17/25 MPG??
Can that be true? The 750i, which weighs just a few hundred pounds more only gets 15/22 mpg?
I hope so, but I'm skeptical. Typo? |
05-08-2010, 01:26 PM | #5 |
Private First Class
53
Rep 133
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2010, 02:05 PM | #6 |
Colonel
121
Rep 2,099
Posts |
I believe the gearing IS different by default when comparing an 8 speed to a 6 speed, no?
2 mpg really isn't that much when you're talking averages. I think the changeover from standard 5 speeds to standard 6 speeds way back when had at least a 1 mpg difference. Other than the lower weight, there really isn't any other explanation. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2010, 08:04 PM | #7 |
Private
5
Rep 57
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2010, 08:15 PM | #8 |
Second Lieutenant
129
Rep 276
Posts |
I went to the event today, and drove the same cars you probably did.
Loved the ride. Could definitely tell the difference between Sport+ and normal modes. I've never driven a car with active steering before and after the slalom runs i am sold. Made the car that much easier to maneuver vs the 5-series that didn't have it. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2010, 09:00 AM | #9 |
Second Lieutenant
92
Rep 203
Posts |
At the New York Auto Show, the placard on the 535i indicated an EPA estimated 19/28 mpg for the manual and 20/29 mpg for the automatic. I did not read the 550i placard.
There is a very good article in the June Car and Driver magazine titled "Suck, Squeeze, Bang, Blow, Ad Infinitum". It summarizes ways to increase the efficiency of an internal combustion engine. It would seem that in the 535i that BMW has made excellent (and expensive) choices towards improving efficiency without sacrificing performance. Direct-Injection turbo plus variable valve timing and lift (VANOS) are important examples. The other stuff such as electric power steering, light engines and the eight-speed automatic also help to improve the numbers. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2010, 09:24 AM | #10 |
Banned
99
Rep 1,828
Posts
Drives: 2016 Tesla Model X P90DL
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near NYC
|
OP,
Did you also notice that the same car (550i) with manual gets 15/22 vs 17/25 for auto It's not a typo This 8-speed tranny is THAT efficient |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2010, 07:53 PM | #11 |
Enlisted Member
1
Rep 36
Posts |
I will be interested to see what I can get for mileage when I really try with my 550i manual 6 speed. I bet I can get much more than 22mpg on the highway if I am trying to be efficient. I wouldn't be surprised if i got 26-28mpg's. I got 34mpg on a 400 mile trip with my 335i while being a hyper mile dork. I will do the same with the 550i and see what happens. Of course, I plan to get some really low mileage too.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2010, 11:15 PM | #12 | |
Banned
99
Rep 1,828
Posts
Drives: 2016 Tesla Model X P90DL
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near NYC
|
Quote:
I can also get my MT 335i up to 33+mpg mark and it has only 26 EPA rating So if you really try to get good mpg with MT, it's definetelly possible to squeeze 3-5mpg more than EPA P.S. I bet 550i with 8-speed AT could get close to 28-30 if you drive it on 8th gear @ 50-55mph It'll be almost on idle Last gear is very tall |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2010, 11:21 AM | #13 | |
Private First Class
53
Rep 133
Posts |
Quote:
However, for the last decade or so, manuals have been rated lower in fuel efficiency versus the automatics, even before the 8-speed came out. These figures suggest a 13+% improvement with the autobox. Pretty impressive. I'll wait for real-world data to be 100% convinced. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|